Wednesday, July 30, 2014

New Data Transfer Speed broken , guess where!!!

WOW
Research group at DTU Photonics has recaptured the world record for data transfer.
World champions in data transmission, see Lyngby, where High-Speed ​​Optical Communications Group (UHSOC) at DTU Photonics has just secured another world record. This time the group has broken a record which was set by the Karlsruhe Institut für Technologie, by showing that it is possible to transfer 43 terabits per second with only a single laser transmitter. This is well above the Germans previous record of 32 terabits per second.
The worldwide competition in data rate is helping to develop the technology to meet the massive growth of data traffic on the Internet. It is estimated that Internet traffic annually increases by 40-50 percent. In addition, the Internet as a whole currently stands at a total energy corresponding to a CO 2 emissions of more than two percent of global man-made CO 2 emissions - ie at the level of transport (planes, ships, etc.). But these other industries do not grow by 40 percent a year. Therefore, it is imperative to find solutions for the Internet, where energy consumption is greatly reduced, while the bandwidth is increased. This is the DTU group has demonstrated with this latest record. DTU researchers have previously helped to demonstrate the world's highest aggregate data transmission at 1 petabit per second, but in that case were spent hundreds of lasers.
DTU researchers record has resulted in a in house by the research team used a new type of optical fiber, which they borrowed from the Japanese telecom giant NTT. The fiber contains seven grains (glass thread) instead of only one core, which is in standard fibers. This allows you to move more data. Despite the seven cores, fills this new fiber not more than standard fiber. 
Researchers record result has been verified and presented as a so-called 'post-deadline paper' at the International Conference CLEO 2014.
High-Speed ​​Optical Communications Group at DTU Photonics has repeatedly had the world record for data transmission and in 2009 was the first in the world to break the 'terabit-wall', which was then the almost unattainable challenge of transferring one terabit per second - again based on a single laser. This has now grown to 43 Tbit / s.


THIS IS AMAZING!!

Think about this . Now you can transfer 5 1TB HDD in a second, this is a huge improvement for technology , imagine internet that is actually instant , movies that don't have to buffer or videos that don't take 2 hours to load. Now you can download everything when ever you actually need it , no waiting for updates for your system , just click a button and it updated instantaneously

Source : http://www.dtu.dk/Nyheder/2014/07/Verdensrekord-i-dataoverfoersel-paa-danske-haender-igen.

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Yo and the app hype machine

BYNicole Lee @nicole18 hours ago

0

Yo is a notifications app where all it does is send the word "Yo" to your friends. That's it. Just "Yo." Of course, silly single-purpose apps like these are a dime a dozen -- remember those fart apps of old? -- but the thing that sets Yo apart is that it's actually attracted a whole lot of attention. More than a million dollars' worth, in fact. Yep, this seemingly frivolous app has recently raised around $1.5 million in funding, giving it a valuation close to $10 million. It's also apparently been downloaded more than 2 million times since its tongue-in-cheek April Fools' Day debut.

Crazy? Well, yes, perhaps. But it's not entirely unusual. In case you need a refresher (and probably a laugh or two), here's a look at some of the more overhyped apps in the past few years. Have any other ideas? Leave a comment and let us know of any apps we've missed. Yo and 9 other overhyped apps See all photos 10 Photos

Which of these is the most overhyped app? 0 Comments

Tags: android, apps, color, facebookhome, flappybird, ios, jelly, mailbox, oink, secret, thedaily, tinder, yo, yo app, yoapp Next: eBay brings its RedLaser barcode-scanner app to Google Glass .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > span.fyre-comment-reply-wrapper {top: 18px;}.fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a, .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a:hover {top: 20px;} AboutAbout EngadgetContact usAdvertiseAbout Our AdsCommunityForumsEngadget MetaCommunity guidelinesReviewsProduct reviewsWrite a reviewContributeSend us a tip!Add to our databaseWrite a reviewStart a discussionAsk a questionLive eventsEngadget ExpandEngadget LivePopular topicsMobileHDAltSoftwareAppleFollow EngadgetEngadget AppsMore Apps from Engadget

Subscribe to Engadget Newsletter

Top categoriescellphoneslaptops / portablestabletsheadphonescamerasroutershdtvs / televisionsportable media playersfitness devicese-book readersdigital media playersMobileCellphonesTabletsBluetooth HeadsetsGPSPhotographyCamerasCamera LensesCamcordersDigital Photo FramesGamingConsoles (home)Consoles (portable)Controllers / GamepadsJoysticks / Flight / RacingComputersLaptops/PortablesDesktopsOperating SystemsPeripheralsKeyboardsMiceMonitorsComputer SpeakersHeadsetsPrintersScannersPen TabletsUSB / Firewire HubsWebcamsPersonal TechHeadphonesPortable Media PlayersE-book ReadersFitnessMiscellaneous DevicesNetworkingRoutersSwitches / HubsStorageExternal Hard DrivesFlash DrivesMemory CardsNetwork StorageRAID / Drive ArraysHome TheaterHDTVs / TelevisionsSpeaker DocksDigital Media PlayersRemotes / ControllersA/V ReceiversDVRsSpeakersVideo Disc Players Engadget International EditionsEspañol繁體中文简体中文日本版DeutschlandAOL Tech.

© 2014 AOL Inc.
All rights reserved.Reprints and PermissionsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseTrademarksAOL A-Z HelpAdvertise with Us

the end

View the Original article

The cloud is a big money maker for Microsoft as it rethinks hardware and content

BYDana Wollman @danawollman18 hours ago

0

We always want to know how Microsoft is doing, but today we're paying especially close attention: The company just released its earnings for its fourth fiscal quarter, the first full quarter that new CEO Satya Nadella was on the job. Also, let's not forget that Microsoft just announced it's cutting 18,000 jobs and axing Xbox Entertainment Studios. So how'd the company do? Not bad, actually: The company says revenue is up, largely thanks to its cloud business (previously led by Nadella himself). In particular, Microsoft has its loyal business customers to thank: The company saw big gains in commercial cloud revenue (up 147 percent), Windows licenses and server products. Other honorable mentions include Bing (up 40 percent), Microsoft Office 365 subscriptions and revenue from PC makers.

Largely missing from the report: mentions of hardware. Though the company's new mobile business added nearly $2 billion in revenue, but the firm also took a $38 million hit on Surface RT inventory after canceling the Surface Mini, according to Chief Financial Officer Amy Hood. Basically, then, there are few surprises here: Microsoft made the most money off its bread and butter -- things like enterprise services, the cloud and its core Windows business. And to be honest, we expected as much. Consider that earlier this month, Nadella posted an open letter to employees, reiterating that its mission was to offer productivity tools in a "cloud-first" world. That would indeed seem to be what Microsoft is good at.

All told, the company generated $4.61 billion in profit on $23.38 billion in revenue. To put that in perspective, revenue for the fourth-quarter was up 18 percent over the year-ago period. Profit by 7 percent, but that's to be expected considering Microsoft recently closed its massive $7 billion purchase of Nokia's mobile division. That's it for raw numbers, but Microsoft will be holding a conference call later today to discuss its earnings in more detail. We'll be tuning in, and will update this post as we learn more.

Update: On a call with investors, Chief Financial Officer Amy Hood confirmed that that $38 million hit the company took on "Surface RT inventory" was actually a product that had been in development, but was later canceled. That would be the Surface Mini.

Image credit: Associated Press

0 Comments

Source: Microsoft

Tags: earnings, microsoft Next: Yo and the app hype machine .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > span.fyre-comment-reply-wrapper {top: 18px;}.fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a, .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a:hover {top: 20px;} AboutAbout EngadgetContact usAdvertiseAbout Our AdsCommunityForumsEngadget MetaCommunity guidelinesReviewsProduct reviewsWrite a reviewContributeSend us a tip!Add to our databaseWrite a reviewStart a discussionAsk a questionLive eventsEngadget ExpandEngadget LivePopular topicsMobileHDAltSoftwareAppleFollow EngadgetEngadget AppsMore Apps from Engadget

Subscribe to Engadget Newsletter

Top categoriescellphoneslaptops / portablestabletsheadphonescamerasroutershdtvs / televisionsportable media playersfitness devicese-book readersdigital media playersMobileCellphonesTabletsBluetooth HeadsetsGPSPhotographyCamerasCamera LensesCamcordersDigital Photo FramesGamingConsoles (home)Consoles (portable)Controllers / GamepadsJoysticks / Flight / RacingComputersLaptops/PortablesDesktopsOperating SystemsPeripheralsKeyboardsMiceMonitorsComputer SpeakersHeadsetsPrintersScannersPen TabletsUSB / Firewire HubsWebcamsPersonal TechHeadphonesPortable Media PlayersE-book ReadersFitnessMiscellaneous DevicesNetworkingRoutersSwitches / HubsStorageExternal Hard DrivesFlash DrivesMemory CardsNetwork StorageRAID / Drive ArraysHome TheaterHDTVs / TelevisionsSpeaker DocksDigital Media PlayersRemotes / ControllersA/V ReceiversDVRsSpeakersVideo Disc Players Engadget International EditionsEspañol繁體中文简体中文日本版DeutschlandAOL Tech.

© 2014 AOL Inc.
All rights reserved.Reprints and PermissionsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseTrademarksAOL A-Z HelpAdvertise with Us

the end

View the Original article

China and Macs power Apple's growth as iPad demand wanes

BYZach Honig @zachhonig17 hours ago

0

Apple had a very strong second quarter. iPhone sales were up significantly over Q2 2013 and the company pocketed $700 million more in profit than it did during the same period last year, even though iPad sales slipped slightly. The company's third quarter results, released today, reflect a similar trend. At $37.4 billion, revenue is up $2.3 billion over the same period last year, thanks in no small part to boosted sales in Asia. iPhone and Mac adoption remains strong, with 13- and 18-percent increases over the same period in 2013, respectively, but iPad and iPod sales both slipped, registering 9-percent and 36-percent respective drops. Apple sold 35 million iPhones during Q3 of this year, compared to 31 million in 2013, while iPad sales dropped to 13.3 million, from 14.6 million last year.

Still, Apple fell short of expectations. During its Q2 conference call in April, in what's typically a conservative estimate, reps suggested that Q3 revenue could approach $38 billion. Earnings were $600 million shy of that amount, however, with revenue of $37.4 billion and a $7.7 billion net profit, but bested Q3 2013, when Apple posted revenue of $35.3 billion and a $6.9 billion profit. Tim Cook doesn't seem to be concerned about the drop in iPad sales. "This isn't something that worries us," he told the Wall Street Journal. Meanwhile, Apple's projecting boosted revenue in Q4, between $37 and $40 billion -- the company reportedly has quite a few new products in the pipeline, which could impact its balance sheet for the rest of the year. A smartwatch is expected soon, following several related hires, while a larger iPhone may appear this fall alongside the launch of iOS 8.

0 Comments

Source: Apple

Tags: aapl, apple, earnings, mobilepostcross Next: The cloud is a big money maker for Microsoft as it rethinks hardware and content .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > span.fyre-comment-reply-wrapper {top: 18px;}.fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a, .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a:hover {top: 20px;} AboutAbout EngadgetContact usAdvertiseAbout Our AdsCommunityForumsEngadget MetaCommunity guidelinesReviewsProduct reviewsWrite a reviewContributeSend us a tip!Add to our databaseWrite a reviewStart a discussionAsk a questionLive eventsEngadget ExpandEngadget LivePopular topicsMobileHDAltSoftwareAppleFollow EngadgetEngadget AppsMore Apps from Engadget

Subscribe to Engadget Newsletter

Top categoriescellphoneslaptops / portablestabletsheadphonescamerasroutershdtvs / televisionsportable media playersfitness devicese-book readersdigital media playersMobileCellphonesTabletsBluetooth HeadsetsGPSPhotographyCamerasCamera LensesCamcordersDigital Photo FramesGamingConsoles (home)Consoles (portable)Controllers / GamepadsJoysticks / Flight / RacingComputersLaptops/PortablesDesktopsOperating SystemsPeripheralsKeyboardsMiceMonitorsComputer SpeakersHeadsetsPrintersScannersPen TabletsUSB / Firewire HubsWebcamsPersonal TechHeadphonesPortable Media PlayersE-book ReadersFitnessMiscellaneous DevicesNetworkingRoutersSwitches / HubsStorageExternal Hard DrivesFlash DrivesMemory CardsNetwork StorageRAID / Drive ArraysHome TheaterHDTVs / TelevisionsSpeaker DocksDigital Media PlayersRemotes / ControllersA/V ReceiversDVRsSpeakersVideo Disc Players Engadget International EditionsEspañol繁體中文简体中文日本版DeutschlandAOL Tech.

© 2014 AOL Inc.
All rights reserved.Reprints and PermissionsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseTrademarksAOL A-Z HelpAdvertise with Us

the end

View the Original article

Government turns to robots for security interviews

BYTerrence O'Brien @TerrenceOBrien17 hours ago

0

National Center for Credibility Assessment is looking to bring the process of doling out national security clearances into the future. As it does more often than not, "the future" in this case means robots. Alright, well not robots exactly but a virtual avatar powered by a computer program. When you apply for security clearance, you first have to fill out a form that requires you to disclose all past drug use, crimes and mental health issues. Those same subjects are then revisited with an actual human, but the NCCA thinks it might be more effective to jump straight to an interview with a computer. In a study Army trainees were put through a mock interview with a racially ambiguous avatar. Turns out the pretend applicants were much more likely to admit to mental health problems or alcohol abuse when speaking to the computer than they were when filling out a form. Not only that, but at the end of the interview they simply volunteered additional info after being asked if their was anything else they'd like to talk about.

The program behind the interrogator is able to recognize responses from the subject and follow multiple branches of conversation, but it's not quite a proper artificial intelligence. It's more like a menu triggered by vocal cues. But by turning to machines, the government could reduce gender or cultural bias in interviews while also eliciting more honest responses from subjects. Though, the current system still includes connecting people up to traditional polygraph equipment and follow up interviews would need to be conducted with actual human beings. But the NCCA is still hopeful that they can save the government both time and money. We can only assume future iterations will include a proper AI and the ability to recognize human emotion. 0 Comments

Via: Motherboard

Source: NCCA

Tags: avatar, government, job interview, National Center for Credibility Assessment, NCCA Next: China and Macs power Apple's growth as iPad demand wanes .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > span.fyre-comment-reply-wrapper {top: 18px;}.fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a, .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a:hover {top: 20px;} AboutAbout EngadgetContact usAdvertiseAbout Our AdsCommunityForumsEngadget MetaCommunity guidelinesReviewsProduct reviewsWrite a reviewContributeSend us a tip!Add to our databaseWrite a reviewStart a discussionAsk a questionLive eventsEngadget ExpandEngadget LivePopular topicsMobileHDAltSoftwareAppleFollow EngadgetEngadget AppsMore Apps from Engadget

Subscribe to Engadget Newsletter

Top categoriescellphoneslaptops / portablestabletsheadphonescamerasroutershdtvs / televisionsportable media playersfitness devicese-book readersdigital media playersMobileCellphonesTabletsBluetooth HeadsetsGPSPhotographyCamerasCamera LensesCamcordersDigital Photo FramesGamingConsoles (home)Consoles (portable)Controllers / GamepadsJoysticks / Flight / RacingComputersLaptops/PortablesDesktopsOperating SystemsPeripheralsKeyboardsMiceMonitorsComputer SpeakersHeadsetsPrintersScannersPen TabletsUSB / Firewire HubsWebcamsPersonal TechHeadphonesPortable Media PlayersE-book ReadersFitnessMiscellaneous DevicesNetworkingRoutersSwitches / HubsStorageExternal Hard DrivesFlash DrivesMemory CardsNetwork StorageRAID / Drive ArraysHome TheaterHDTVs / TelevisionsSpeaker DocksDigital Media PlayersRemotes / ControllersA/V ReceiversDVRsSpeakersVideo Disc Players Engadget International EditionsEspañol繁體中文简体中文日本版DeutschlandAOL Tech.

© 2014 AOL Inc.
All rights reserved.Reprints and PermissionsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseTrademarksAOL A-Z HelpAdvertise with Us

the end

View the Original article

Zepp takes a swing at baseball with its tiny data analyzer

BYEdgar Alvarez @abcdedgar16 hours ago

0

As someone who doesn't play baseball often, if ever, I need all the help I can get. But since America's Pastime isn't my first sport of choice to practice, I'm okay admitting how extremely terrible I am at it. For others, however, things might be a little different. Whether it's kids who are just starting to play the game or those who would like to make a career out of it, Zepp Labs, creator of the GolfSense, believes it has made something that can help them along the way. Enter the Zepp baseball swing analyzer, an itty-bitty sensor that attaches to a baseball bat and can be utilized to record a ton of useful information, with the ultimate goal being to use this data to help improve your skills. Zepp also does the same for other sports -- that same sensor works with golf or tennis sessions; you just need a different mounting kit for each.Zepp's baseball swing analyzer See all photos 20 Photos

On the baseball (or softball) front, it's as easy as placing the sensor inside the rubbery holster and, subsequently, securing it around the bottom of the bat. At roughly six grams (the rubber mount adds 13 grams), the only element reminding you of its existence is the big, bright, greenish-yellow color it features; otherwise you wouldn't even know it's there. Once you actually get going, the companion app, available for iOS and Android, takes care of showing you the results of your swings, including how fast you're hitting the ball and the amount of time it takes for you to make contact. Additionally, Zepp's device can determine the exact shape and angles of your swing, which you, or your coach, can later analyze and break down to determine what you need to do better next time out. The app does a great job of compiling all that data and making it fun to look at -- for example, the 3D viewer lets you see your swing from various angles, from start to finish.

Of course, not everyone is able to perform at the same level, and that's why Zepp made it easy to adjust goals depending on where people think they fit in. In my case, I set up a session with a Bat Speed Impact goal of 73MPH, to which I fell extremely short by taking a swing of 59MPH. Embarrassing, I know, but it got even worse: At one point, I managed to completely miss a ball that wasn't even pitched at me (!). Thankfully, I had other people around who could make better use of the tiny device. Regardless of my subpar baseball skills, though, the Zepp sensor performs as advertised. At $150, it may not be for everyone, but there's definitely a market for it.

"The biggest thing in this wearable space is capturing meaningful data and [using] it properly."

Zepp Labs CEO Jason Fass told me that his product, despite its short history, has already been adopted by "a number" of Major League Baseball teams, though he didn't go into any further specifics. "The target market isn't just kids," he said. "I think the biggest thing in this wearable space is capturing meaningful data and [using] it properly." Fass also said to me that while the focus right now is on the current-generation Zepp sensor, the plan is to continue to expand the technology to more sports next year, including both types of football, which could mean some competition for Adidas' miCoach ecosystem.Zepp Baseball app See all photos 11 Photos

0 Comments

Tags: Baseball, Golf, hands-on, Sports, Tennis, wearable, Zepp, Zepp Labs, Zepp Sensor, ZeppLabs Next: Government turns to robots for security interviews .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > span.fyre-comment-reply-wrapper {top: 18px;}.fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a, .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a:hover {top: 20px;} AboutAbout EngadgetContact usAdvertiseAbout Our AdsCommunityForumsEngadget MetaCommunity guidelinesReviewsProduct reviewsWrite a reviewContributeSend us a tip!Add to our databaseWrite a reviewStart a discussionAsk a questionLive eventsEngadget ExpandEngadget LivePopular topicsMobileHDAltSoftwareAppleFollow EngadgetEngadget AppsMore Apps from Engadget

Subscribe to Engadget Newsletter

Top categoriescellphoneslaptops / portablestabletsheadphonescamerasroutershdtvs / televisionsportable media playersfitness devicese-book readersdigital media playersMobileCellphonesTabletsBluetooth HeadsetsGPSPhotographyCamerasCamera LensesCamcordersDigital Photo FramesGamingConsoles (home)Consoles (portable)Controllers / GamepadsJoysticks / Flight / RacingComputersLaptops/PortablesDesktopsOperating SystemsPeripheralsKeyboardsMiceMonitorsComputer SpeakersHeadsetsPrintersScannersPen TabletsUSB / Firewire HubsWebcamsPersonal TechHeadphonesPortable Media PlayersE-book ReadersFitnessMiscellaneous DevicesNetworkingRoutersSwitches / HubsStorageExternal Hard DrivesFlash DrivesMemory CardsNetwork StorageRAID / Drive ArraysHome TheaterHDTVs / TelevisionsSpeaker DocksDigital Media PlayersRemotes / ControllersA/V ReceiversDVRsSpeakersVideo Disc Players Engadget International EditionsEspañol繁體中文简体中文日本版DeutschlandAOL Tech.

© 2014 AOL Inc.
All rights reserved.Reprints and PermissionsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseTrademarksAOL A-Z HelpAdvertise with Us

the end

View the Original article

You can now unlock your Motorola phone with a 'digital tattoo'

BYJon Fingas @jonfingas16 hours ago

0

Moto X digital tattoo unlock

Hate unlocking your Android smartphone so much that even Face Unlock or Skip feels like too much of a hassle? Motorola just came to your rescue. The company has partnered with VivaLnk to launch the previously teased Digital Tattoo, an NFC-based skin tag that unlocks your phone (currently limited to the Moto X) with a quick tap. The tattoo can stay on your body for up to five days, and it should survive abuses like showers and sweat-laden runs. It's a clever approach that might be appealing if you're fed up with PIN codes and patterns, although the back-of-a-napkin math suggests that you're paying a lot just to save a couple of seconds when checking your email. VivaLnk is asking $10 for packs of 10 tattoos, or enough to last 50 days -- you'll have to spend $80 to get through a whole year. It could be useful for those busy days when you're constantly waking up your handset, but you might be better off rolling that money into a Moto 360 or your next big phone upgrade.

0 Comments

Source: Official Motorola Blog

Tags: android, digitaltattoo, eskin, google, lenovo, mobilepostcross, motorola, motox, nfc, smartphone, tattoo, video, vivalnk, wearable Next: Zepp takes a swing at baseball with its tiny data analyzer Motorola Moto X

Motorola Moto X thumbnail image Motorola Moto X 16GB Unlocked 32GB Unlocked 64GB Unlocked 16GB AT&T 32GB AT&T 16GB Sprint 16GB T-Mobile 16GB Verizon 16GB US Cellular Get it for FREE Key specs Reviews • 51 Prices Discussions Type Smartphone Operating system Android (Jelly Bean [4.2]) Screen size 4.7 inches Internal memory 16 GB Carriers (US) AT&T, Sprint-Nextel, T-Mobile, Verizon / Alltel, Other Dimensions 5.09 x 2.57 x 0.22 in Weight 4.59 oz Announced 2013-08-01 see all specs → 8.8average user rating Reception and call quality 8.9 Display 8.9 Battery life 8.7 Camera 7.1 Ease of use 9.4 Design and form factor 9.5 Portability (size / weight) 9.6 Media support 8.8 Durability 8.6 Ecosystem (apps, accessories, etc.) 8.9

Get better reviews from people who actually have this product!

write a reviewsee all reviews →

Displaying prices for model:

16GB Unlocked-Black 16GB Unlocked-White 16GB AT&T-White 16GB AT&T-Black 16GB Sprint-Black 16GB Sprint-White 16GB Verizon-Black 16GB Verizon-White Amazon.com FREE + tax & shipping Buy now Best Buy $1.00 on contract Buy now Best Buy $549.99 + tax & shipping Buy now 6 What do you think about Motorola's plans for the What do you think about Motorola's plans for the "X"? 13 Should I avoid Motorola phones? Should I avoid Motorola phones? 2 US only strategy US only strategy

Talk about the Motorola Moto X with other people who own it too!

start a discussion see all discussions → .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > span.fyre-comment-reply-wrapper {top: 18px;}.fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a, .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a:hover {top: 20px;} AboutAbout EngadgetContact usAdvertiseAbout Our AdsCommunityForumsEngadget MetaCommunity guidelinesReviewsProduct reviewsWrite a reviewContributeSend us a tip!Add to our databaseWrite a reviewStart a discussionAsk a questionLive eventsEngadget ExpandEngadget LivePopular topicsMobileHDAltSoftwareAppleFollow EngadgetEngadget AppsMore Apps from Engadget

Subscribe to Engadget Newsletter

Top categoriescellphoneslaptops / portablestabletsheadphonescamerasroutershdtvs / televisionsportable media playersfitness devicese-book readersdigital media playersMobileCellphonesTabletsBluetooth HeadsetsGPSPhotographyCamerasCamera LensesCamcordersDigital Photo FramesGamingConsoles (home)Consoles (portable)Controllers / GamepadsJoysticks / Flight / RacingComputersLaptops/PortablesDesktopsOperating SystemsPeripheralsKeyboardsMiceMonitorsComputer SpeakersHeadsetsPrintersScannersPen TabletsUSB / Firewire HubsWebcamsPersonal TechHeadphonesPortable Media PlayersE-book ReadersFitnessMiscellaneous DevicesNetworkingRoutersSwitches / HubsStorageExternal Hard DrivesFlash DrivesMemory CardsNetwork StorageRAID / Drive ArraysHome TheaterHDTVs / TelevisionsSpeaker DocksDigital Media PlayersRemotes / ControllersA/V ReceiversDVRsSpeakersVideo Disc Players Engadget International EditionsEspañol繁體中文简体中文日本版DeutschlandAOL Tech.

© 2014 AOL Inc.
All rights reserved.Reprints and PermissionsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseTrademarksAOL A-Z HelpAdvertise with Us

the end

View the Original article

Artist uses over-sized pixels to keep an eye on London's pedestrians

BYBilly Steele @wmsteele15 hours ago

0

Folks strolling past the Welcome Collection's venue in London may have an eery feeling that they're being watched. Well, that's because they are. And not just by a government's prying eyes, but with 650 over-sized pixels that render their own set of gazing peepers. Peter Hudson's Eye Contact is on display in the buildings front windows, observing the passers-by all day long with ocular footage from nearly 70 volunteers. At night the eyes close for rest -- unless a set of sensors detect the occasional nocturnal pedestrian. The installation is meant question our reliance on digital screens and the manner in which they influence interaction. "Eyes are both a symbol of perception and an instantly recognizable human feature, so by presenting them through a heavily pixellated video display, I'm challenging the usually fluid process of recognition," Hudson explained. Londoners can expect for the screens to keep watch on them for the next year.

[Photo credit: Peter Hudson]

0 Comments

Via: Vice, New Scientist

Source: Peter Hudson, Welcome Trust

Tags: art, eyecontact, installation, london, peterhudson, video, welcomecollection, welcometrust Next: You can now unlock your Motorola phone with a 'digital tattoo' .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > span.fyre-comment-reply-wrapper {top: 18px;}.fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a, .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a:hover {top: 20px;} AboutAbout EngadgetContact usAdvertiseAbout Our AdsCommunityForumsEngadget MetaCommunity guidelinesReviewsProduct reviewsWrite a reviewContributeSend us a tip!Add to our databaseWrite a reviewStart a discussionAsk a questionLive eventsEngadget ExpandEngadget LivePopular topicsMobileHDAltSoftwareAppleFollow EngadgetEngadget AppsMore Apps from Engadget

Subscribe to Engadget Newsletter

Top categoriescellphoneslaptops / portablestabletsheadphonescamerasroutershdtvs / televisionsportable media playersfitness devicese-book readersdigital media playersMobileCellphonesTabletsBluetooth HeadsetsGPSPhotographyCamerasCamera LensesCamcordersDigital Photo FramesGamingConsoles (home)Consoles (portable)Controllers / GamepadsJoysticks / Flight / RacingComputersLaptops/PortablesDesktopsOperating SystemsPeripheralsKeyboardsMiceMonitorsComputer SpeakersHeadsetsPrintersScannersPen TabletsUSB / Firewire HubsWebcamsPersonal TechHeadphonesPortable Media PlayersE-book ReadersFitnessMiscellaneous DevicesNetworkingRoutersSwitches / HubsStorageExternal Hard DrivesFlash DrivesMemory CardsNetwork StorageRAID / Drive ArraysHome TheaterHDTVs / TelevisionsSpeaker DocksDigital Media PlayersRemotes / ControllersA/V ReceiversDVRsSpeakersVideo Disc Players Engadget International EditionsEspañol繁體中文简体中文日本版DeutschlandAOL Tech.

© 2014 AOL Inc.
All rights reserved.Reprints and PermissionsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseTrademarksAOL A-Z HelpAdvertise with Us

the end

View the Original article

ASUS has the world's fastest WiFi router... for now

BYEdgar Alvarez @abcdedgar14 hours ago

0

Hey look, a new router from ASUS and, apparently, it is super, super fast. According to the Taiwanese company, its RT-AC87 is "the world's first" with Wave 2 features, which bring better reliability, major speed boosts and overall performance improvements to the 802.11ac generation of WiFi routers -- one that, by the way, has yet to break through to the mainstream. Thanks to this novel technology, ASUS' RT-AC87 can beam out 5 GHz signals with up to 1.73 Gbps speeds, making it a great option for someone who has a lot of different 802.11ac-equipped devices under a single roof. People that, you know, love watching stuff on Netflix, like to livestream games to the internet or just have too many connected things happening all at once. The RT-AC87 will be available "shortly" for $270, though it'll be limited to North America. For the time being, ASUS can enjoy having the speediest router in town, at least until D-Link, Netgear, Belkin and the rest of them show up to the party.

0 Comments

Source: ASUS

Tags: 802.11ac, ASUS, ASUS RT-AC87, Router, RT-AC87, WiFi router, WiFirouter, Wireless Router, WirelessRouter Next: Artist uses over-sized pixels to keep an eye on London's pedestrians ASUS RT-AC87U

ASUS RT-AC87U thumbnail image ASUS RT-AC87U Key specs Reviews • 0 Prices Discussions Type Wireless router WiFi 802.11 a, ac, b, g, n Bands Dual-band MIMO support Yes Ethernet 10/100/1000 [Gigabit] Announced 2014-01-05 see all specs → There are not any reviews for this product yet.
Why not be the first to write one?

Get better reviews from people who actually have this product!

write a reviewsee all reviews → No one has started a discussion about this product yet.
Why not be the first?

Talk about the ASUS RT-AC87U with other people who own it too!

start a discussion see all discussions → .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > span.fyre-comment-reply-wrapper {top: 18px;}.fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a, .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a:hover {top: 20px;} AboutAbout EngadgetContact usAdvertiseAbout Our AdsCommunityForumsEngadget MetaCommunity guidelinesReviewsProduct reviewsWrite a reviewContributeSend us a tip!Add to our databaseWrite a reviewStart a discussionAsk a questionLive eventsEngadget ExpandEngadget LivePopular topicsMobileHDAltSoftwareAppleFollow EngadgetEngadget AppsMore Apps from Engadget

Subscribe to Engadget Newsletter

Top categoriescellphoneslaptops / portablestabletsheadphonescamerasroutershdtvs / televisionsportable media playersfitness devicese-book readersdigital media playersMobileCellphonesTabletsBluetooth HeadsetsGPSPhotographyCamerasCamera LensesCamcordersDigital Photo FramesGamingConsoles (home)Consoles (portable)Controllers / GamepadsJoysticks / Flight / RacingComputersLaptops/PortablesDesktopsOperating SystemsPeripheralsKeyboardsMiceMonitorsComputer SpeakersHeadsetsPrintersScannersPen TabletsUSB / Firewire HubsWebcamsPersonal TechHeadphonesPortable Media PlayersE-book ReadersFitnessMiscellaneous DevicesNetworkingRoutersSwitches / HubsStorageExternal Hard DrivesFlash DrivesMemory CardsNetwork StorageRAID / Drive ArraysHome TheaterHDTVs / TelevisionsSpeaker DocksDigital Media PlayersRemotes / ControllersA/V ReceiversDVRsSpeakersVideo Disc Players Engadget International EditionsEspañol繁體中文简体中文日本版DeutschlandAOL Tech.

© 2014 AOL Inc.
All rights reserved.Reprints and PermissionsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseTrademarksAOL A-Z HelpAdvertise with Us

the end

View the Original article

Edward Snowden's preferred OS has a major security flaw

BYJon Fingas @jonfingas14 hours ago

0

Tails runnign the Tor browser

Think you're safe from spies because you're using Tails, the same Linux distribution that Edward Snowden uses to remain anonymous? Unfortunately, you'll still have to be on your guard. Security firm Exodus Intelligence has revealed that the latest version of the OS, 1.1, is vulnerable to attacks that could be used to unmask your identity. The researchers say they won't publish details of the exploit until there's a patch, but the Tails team will have to wait up to a week before it gets a report it can use to whip up an emergency fix. In the meantime, the discovery is an all too blunt reminder that no software offers a complete guarantee of privacy -- even if it's built with anonymity in mind.

We're happy to see that TAILS 1.1 is being released tomorrow. Our multiple RCE/de-anonymization zero-days are still effective. #tails #tor

- Exodus Intelligence (@ExodusIntel) July 21, 2014 0 Comments

Source: Tails (1), (2), Exodus Intelligence (Twitter)

Tags: edwardsnowden, exodusintelligence, exploit, linux, opensource, privacy, security, software, tails, tor, vulnerability Next: Engadget Daily: NVIDIA's Shield Tablet, Atari's 'Pridefest' and more! .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > span.fyre-comment-reply-wrapper {top: 18px;}.fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a, .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a:hover {top: 20px;} AboutAbout EngadgetContact usAdvertiseAbout Our AdsCommunityForumsEngadget MetaCommunity guidelinesReviewsProduct reviewsWrite a reviewContributeSend us a tip!Add to our databaseWrite a reviewStart a discussionAsk a questionLive eventsEngadget ExpandEngadget LivePopular topicsMobileHDAltSoftwareAppleFollow EngadgetEngadget AppsMore Apps from Engadget

Subscribe to Engadget Newsletter

Top categoriescellphoneslaptops / portablestabletsheadphonescamerasroutershdtvs / televisionsportable media playersfitness devicese-book readersdigital media playersMobileCellphonesTabletsBluetooth HeadsetsGPSPhotographyCamerasCamera LensesCamcordersDigital Photo FramesGamingConsoles (home)Consoles (portable)Controllers / GamepadsJoysticks / Flight / RacingComputersLaptops/PortablesDesktopsOperating SystemsPeripheralsKeyboardsMiceMonitorsComputer SpeakersHeadsetsPrintersScannersPen TabletsUSB / Firewire HubsWebcamsPersonal TechHeadphonesPortable Media PlayersE-book ReadersFitnessMiscellaneous DevicesNetworkingRoutersSwitches / HubsStorageExternal Hard DrivesFlash DrivesMemory CardsNetwork StorageRAID / Drive ArraysHome TheaterHDTVs / TelevisionsSpeaker DocksDigital Media PlayersRemotes / ControllersA/V ReceiversDVRsSpeakersVideo Disc Players Engadget International EditionsEspañol繁體中文简体中文日本版DeutschlandAOL Tech.

© 2014 AOL Inc.
All rights reserved.Reprints and PermissionsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseTrademarksAOL A-Z HelpAdvertise with Us

the end

View the Original article

Amazon Fire phone review: a unique device, but you're better off waiting for the sequel

BYBrad Molen @phonewisdom13 hours ago

0

After producing a long line of e-book readers and tablets (not to mention a set-top box), Amazon has its sights set on the smartphone market. But finding success here won't be easy, even for an established tech giant like Amazon. With the Fire phone, the online retailer is coming in as an unproven underdog, hoping to bring iPhone and Android users into its fold. CEO Jeff Bezos says the only way to do that is to differentiate; to wow potential buyers with new features they didn't even realize they needed. These unique offerings include 3D head-tracking, product scanning and fast help from customer service agents.

70AmazonFire Phone

Pros

Mayday provides quick access to tech supportComes with free year of Prime membershipGood call quality

Cons

Exclusive to AT&T, no global options3D effects can cause motion sicknessLimited ecosystemDynamic Perspective and Firefly need some workUnique features hamper battery life and performanceSummary

Amazon's debut phone isn't bad, per se, but there's little incentive for anyone to switch carriers or platforms to buy it. Its unique features don't provide enough utility, and come at the expense of both battery life and performance.

Regardless of the bells and whistles on offer here, Amazon is walking down a difficult path: The Fire is only available on AT&T, and at $200 on-contract ($650 full retail), it's going up against high-end devices from companies that have been making phones for years. In order to win over customers, Amazon has to convince them that the Fire is worth dropping loyalties, switching carriers, resigning contracts and handing over a lot of money. Unfortunately, the company has a few lessons to learn before that's going to happen.Amazon Fire phone review See all photos 48 Photos

Hardware

Amazon appears to have put so much effort on the Fire phone's unique features that it didn't focus on making the device attractive. It looks more like a prototype than a phone that's supposed to compete against well-designed beauts like the iPhone 5s, LG G3 and HTC One M8. The use of glass on the front and back is a throwback to the Nexus 4 and iPhone 4/4s, which means it's a fingerprint magnet and more susceptible to breaks than polycarbonate. The sides are protected with a rubberized polyurethane material, however, which should improve the phone's chances of survival if dropped.

The Fire is thicker than the iPhone 5s and Galaxy S5, just as thick as the LG G3 and thinner than the One M8 and Moto X. Yet Amazon's inaugural phone feels thicker than all of them due to its blocky design: The sides are mostly blunt, but they taper toward the back, which lies completely flat. And at 5.64 ounces (160g), it's heavier than the competition. The only exception is the One M8, which weighs exactly the same as the Fire and has a more premium-feeling aluminum body.

Amazon's goal was to make the Fire ideal for one-handed use, and indeed, it succeeded: The screen measures a manageable 4.7 inches and the sides are easy to grip. It's comfortable to hold and my thumb could reach nearly every part of the display, so I rarely felt like I had to use two hands unless I was typing a message.

The back isn't as busy as I expected. Despite being an AT&T exclusive, the carrier's logo is nowhere to be seen on the device (front or back). All you'll see here is Amazon's logo near the top and the obligatory federal certification details near the bottom; aside from that, the camera, LED flash and mic are neatly tucked away in the top-right corner.

Sadly, the front is a massive contrast to the minimal back, with the five lenses being the primary culprits. There's a Kinect-like sensor on each corner and a selfie cam just to the right of the earpiece on the top. (If you're already wary of Big Brother, the idea that five eyes are looking back at you won't help your anxiety.) The only button is a Samsung-esque home key that protrudes out of the glass underneath the display.

Finally, the bottom of the phone houses a stereo speaker, mic and micro-USB 2.0 charging port, while the left side features a volume rocker, camera/Firefly quick-access button and nano-SIM slot. The other stereo speaker is on the top, between the 3.5mm headphone jack and power key; the latter is placed on the left side, which is perfect if you hold the phone in your right hand. Since I prefer using my left hand, however, this was a big pain point.

Though it's not horrible by any means, the Fire's display quality is not on par with other flagships. It has a 4.7-inch 720p LCD panel, which offers a relatively unimpressive pixel density of 315 ppi. This is far lower than the GS5, One M8 and G3, and only a few ticks below the iPhone 5s. On a positive note, the viewing angles are good and text is still crisper than I would've expected. Its colors are accurate and the 590-nit display is incredibly bright, which makes a difference when you're trying to read the screen in direct sunlight. The video quality isn't quite as good as other flagships, but otherwise there's very little to complain about aside from the difference in resolution.

The $200 model comes with 32GB of internal storage, which beats out the 16GB that the iPhone 5s and GS5 offer at the same price. It doesn't feature a microSD card slot, however, so you'll need to shell out another $100 if you want the 64GB model.

One of the biggest disappointments about the Fire phone is its agreement with AT&T. It's also not launching with any international availability. Even worse, the phone is locked to only function with AT&T SIM cards, so if you plan to travel internationally, you'll need to be lucky enough to get an unlock code, either through the carrier or unofficial means. All of these factors will severely limit the number of phones Amazon can sell; very few people will want the Fire desperately enough to switch carriers or go through the hassle of unlocking it. If Amazon wants to make the Fire phone successful, it's not going to do so by making it available to just one network in the world. (On a related note, the phone is locked even when you buy it at full retail price directly on Amazon.)

It seems pretty clear, then, that Amazon is trolling us. The Fire's loaded with cellular connectivity: The phone is compatible with nine LTE frequencies for use in most parts of the world, in addition to penta-band HSPA+ and quad-band GSM/EDGE. But the only way you can use it is by paying an arm and a leg for international roaming plans or finding a place willing to provide you with the proper unlock code.

Amazon also made a misstep with the Fire's primitive Bluetooth connectivity. Most, if not all, competing devices support version 4.0+LE, which makes it possible for phones and wearables to communicate with each other. I've confirmed that the Fire's hardware technically supports this version, but its firmware doesn't -- at least, not yet. This means that if you use a smartwatch or a fitness band, you'll want to hold off on buying the Fire until it's updated with official support. Out of curiosity, I sideloaded the Pebble app (it's not available in the Amazon Appstore) and tried to pair my Steel with the Fire; it connected successfully, but the Pebble consistently dropped its connection within a couple minutes.

Fire PhoneSamsung Galaxy S5 (AT&T)Pricing$199 on contract; $650 retail$199 on contract; $650 retailDimensions139.2 x 66.5 x 8.9 mm (5.48 x 2.62 x 0.35 in.)142 x 72.5 x 8.1 mm (5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 in.)Weight160 g (5.64 oz)145 g (5.11 oz)Screen size4.7 inches5.1 inchesScreen resolution1,280 x 720 pixels (315 ppi)1,920 x 1,080 pixels (432 ppi)Screen typeIPS LCDSuper AMOLEDBattery2,400mAh2,800mAhInternal storage32 or 64GB16GB (AT&T version)External storageNoneUp to 128GB, microSDRear camera13MP, OIS16MPFront-facing cam2.1MP2MPNFCYesYesRadios

LTE: (700/800/850/900/1700/1800/1900/2100/2600)

HSPA: (850/900/AWS/1900/2100)

GSM/EDGE: (850/900/1800/1900)

LTE: (700/850/1700/1800/1900/2100/2600) (AT&T)

HSPA: (850/1900/2100) (AT&T)

GSM/EDGE: (850/900/1800/1900) (AT&T)

Bluetoothv3.0v4.0+LESoC2.2GHz quad-core Snapdragon 800, Adreno 330 GPU2.5GHz quad-core Snapdragon 801, Adreno 330 GPURAM2GB2GBWiFidual-band a/b/g/n/acdual-band a/b/g/n/ac, WiFi Direct, Operating systemFire OS 3.5 (Android-based)Android 4.4.2 (TouchWiz)Unique featuresDynamic Perspective

The 3D fad didn't die -- it just went on vacation for a while. After taking a hiatus from smartphones for a couple years, it first made its big comeback on Google's Project Tango phone and then on the Fire phone. But there's a twist. It uses Kinect-like cameras "invisible infrared illumination sensors" that can detect where your head is positioned and how far away it is from your phone. (Only two work at a time, but Amazon added four total lenses just in case a couple are obscured.) The device takes the details of your position and adjusts the field of view on your display to mimic the way you'd actually see things in real life.

Think of it like a window or doorway: When you move your head to the right side, you can peer through and view more stuff to the left that you couldn't see when looking at it straight on. You can also look at objects from different angles -- in a Rubik's Cube game, you can see "around" the sides of the cube just by moving your head -- and if that object is in the foreground, you can actually take a look at what's behind it, simply by shifting to the left or right of the screen.

Dynamic Perspective is primarily used in games, lock screens and maps (iconic landmarks seem to poke out of the screen if you look at them from the right angle), but Amazon subtly applied it to app icons as well; as you tilt the phone or lean your head to one side, you can see the icons move too. The company opened up the software to developers last month, and the Appstore already boasts over 60 titles with the 3D effects added in. It works well in some games, such as the Rubik's Cube one, and an adventure game called Lili, which lets you steer by moving your head. But many apps only use the tech as an afterthought. In Sonic Dash, for instance, you can only use it to look around the main menu, so there's no in-game functionality; Mint.com's app uses Dynamic Perspective in its home screen so that each box looks like it's moving. Unless Amazon can drum up stronger developer interest, you're likely to see lots of apps like this with half-baked implementation.

I wish only third-party apps were half-baked, but unfortunately the performance issues are more far-reaching than that. Dynamic Perspective works well most of the time, but I still noticed plenty of flaws. Choppiness was the most frequent issue, and it usually occurred because I was moving my head around too much and the sensors simply couldn't keep up. In these cases, the effects would pause for a couple seconds before catching up with my movements. On a few occasions, the feature stopped working entirely after I sideloaded and ran apps that aren't available in the Amazon Appstore (more on that later); it immediately began working again after I stopped running those apps. As long as you stick to official Amazon titles and services, you likely won't run into the same issue.

Is there a reason to be concerned about having five cameras staring back at you? Not according to Amazon. Executives emphasized that the Dynamic Perspective cameras act as sensors, and any images or data they collect are never stored anywhere on the phone; everything is deleted almost immediately, and none of it can be accessed through another part of the device.

Concerned about how Dynamic Perspective may affect those with motion sickness, I asked Amazon reps if they've received any negative feedback so far. They told me that they hadn't; it's less likely to make you sick, they said, because the user is in control of how far and how fast the effect goes (the same way many people experience less motion sickness when driving than they do in the passenger seat). So they challenged my wife -- who's susceptible to getting sick from viewing moving backgrounds -- to try it out. We accepted the challenge... and it didn't work; she had to put the phone down after just two minutes. Its effects were just as strong as the parallax feature introduced on iOS 7. If that bothered you as well, you'll want to turn off Dynamic Perspective in the settings right away.

Even if Dynamic Perspective performed better, and even if it doesn't make you sick, it's still a tough sell. It's a neat feature and developers may come up with some cool uses for it, but it isn't enough to persuade millions of iPhone and Android users to leave their preferred platforms, and possibly carriers, to try it out -- even if they are loyal Amazon shoppers. It simply doesn't benefit the user enough.

Firefly

Another new feature on the Fire is called Firefly. Long-press the camera button on the side of the phone, and you're presented with a viewfinder with white bubbles moving all over the screen. Point the camera at a phone number, email address, website, product, book or bar code, and the bubbles will congregate over the relevant information. From there, the camera snaps a picture. The phone then scans each detail and places it into a clipboard that you access by swiping up from the bottom of the screen. Now you can perform an action related to the item: Call a phone number; visit a website; or purchase something through Amazon. It'll also catch TV shows, movies and songs so you can buy or rent flicks at your leisure, find them on streaming services and locate a band on StubHub.

If you've heard of this before, that's because it's been done before, to an extent, by Microsoft, Google, Apple and app makers like Shazam. The difference is that Amazon's implementation is more extensive than the rest (it comes with more features and boasts a catalog of 70 million products to draw from) and it's open to developers, so other services can take advantage of the feature. It could be the ultimate guilty pleasure for the impulse buyer: Scan a friend's Blu-ray disc; immediately compare several online prices; and order the cheapest option right away.

Much like Dynamic Perspective, my experience with Firefly was hit-or-miss. It scanned music and shows with near-perfect accuracy. It could easily pick up a large number of products within a couple seconds -- even something as basic as an office telephone popped up immediately as I waved the phone in front of it -- but this happened roughly 75 percent of the time. The other 25 percent was an exercise in frustration: Either it'd take too long to find anything, or it wouldn't pick anything up at all. It had a hard time looking through sun glare and shrink wrap, and Firefly couldn't grab information from an angle or at a distance (read: more than 10 feet away). Even when phone numbers and websites were nearby, it'd sometimes take two or three tries before giving me an accurate read. On one occasion, I scanned an "888" number and Firefly thought it started with "408."

At times, it'd scan an object and present me with a similar item, but not the actual product itself. When I scanned a Super Mario game's instruction book, for instance, it showed me a Mario backpack. Doing the same for a bottle of Coke, I was prompted to buy a soundtrack of every Coke commercial from 1962 to 1989. (A $22 value -- what a steal!) This might make sense if the products I scanned weren't available in Amazon's store, but they were.

Firefly's missing out on a few golden opportunities. It isn't able to scan street addresses, which you could then pull up on a map; it can't read information on a whiteboard or notepad; and it can't see signs for restaurants or other businesses. Firefly has a lot of potential, but it's only scratching the surface when it comes to convenience and usefulness. I don't expect it to get everything right within a couple seconds, but it needs to be able to recognize more types of stuff for it to become a part of my regular app selection.

Another miss is the fact that Amazon isn't planning to port Firefly over to iOS or Android. The company claims that's because Firefly is optimized for the Fire, and while that may be true, availability on other platforms would translate into more sales on Amazon's site -- the company's bread and butter.

Mayday

One of Amazon's most brilliant features is Mayday. The service, which debuted on the Kindle Fire HDX tablet, promises to connect users with knowledgeable tech advisors in 15 seconds or less. (If you're a tech enthusiast and you have relatives who aren't as savvy as you are, you understand why Mayday is such a smart idea.) The Fire phone also comes with the feature built in; head to the quick settings to find a dedicated Mayday button.

If any good can come out of Amazon's partnership with AT&T, it's this: If you ring up Mayday with a bill concern or carrier-related technical problem, the Amazon rep will "warm transfer" you to AT&T's tech support department. This means the rep will stay on the line with you and answer other questions while you wait.

My calls into Mayday connected between 10 and 20 seconds, with my average wait time coming out to the promised 15 seconds. With my permission, each rep was able to view and remotely control my device to answer my questions; one rep even drew on my screen to show me how to get to a desired feature.

Gestures

Thanks to its relatively petite size, the Fire functions well as a one-handed device. But if you're making the move from a smaller smartphone -- an iPhone, perhaps -- it's going to take some time to get used to a larger handset. Amazon has added one-handed gestures to help you navigate through different parts of the operating system without needing to use a second hand. Flick the phone right or left to open up side panels with menus, settings and other features; a swivel motion opens the quick settings and notifications panel; and moving your head up or down tells the phone to begin scrolling through text (yep, just like Smart Scroll on Samsung phones). Finally, you can tilt the device slightly to "peek" at your status bar if it's normally hidden. Although the gestures effectively allow you to get to different places in the phone with only one hand, it becomes less effective when you have to actually use a finger to select something.

Software

Existing Fire tablet owners may be the most willing group of people to buy Amazon's first phone because they're already tied into the company's ecosystem. The device comes with Fire OS 3.5, a proprietary operating system based on the Android 4.2 open-source platform (AOSP). It's similar to the approach used on the Nokia X and other devices sold in China because this gives manufacturers the flexibility to build whatever they want without being forced to use Google Play Services like the Play Store, Gmail, Games and Google+, to name a few.

This means Fire OS is all about Amazon. Instant Video, Kindle books, Newsstand, Music, Audible audiobooks and Games are all included here. If you want to download apps, you'll need to do so through the Amazon Appstore, which features 240,000 titles. That may sound like a lot, but this is only a fraction of the Play Store and iOS App Store size; it's even smaller than Windows Phone's selection! Quality certainly trumps quantity, of course, and I'll give Amazon some credit for having a lot of popular apps, but I recommend you check out the store before you buy the phone to see if your favorite apps are in there. Also keep in mind that if you paid for an app in the Play Store, you're going to have to pay for it again.

Of course, since Fire OS is based on Android, it's easy to sideload apps (known as APKs) as long as you know how to get them. Programs based on Google Play Services, such as Gmail, immediately crash. Other apps may not work properly either, and as I mentioned earlier, some of them may even adversely affect the defining features on the Fire.

User interface

The Fire OS experience is much different than what you'll find on any other phone in that it has both vertical and horizontal components. Vertically, it has a carousel on top and a standard app grid below; horizontally, there's a slide-out menu for Amazon apps and services on the left and a tray for weather and upcoming appointments on the right. These menus change based on which app you're in.

Arguably the most intriguing part of the OS is the Carousel. As you spin it, you'll find many of your recent apps with timely notifications. Each app has a list of relevant details underneath it, and the content often depends on what you look at the most. You'll see your most recent emails -- complete with the first two lines of each one -- as well as missed texts, settings you've opened lately, your most frequented websites, suggested apps in the Appstore and even third-party stuff like a Zillow app that displays a list of the last few houses you've looked at. You can pin specific apps to the front of the carousel and remove unwanted ones altogether, but you can't reorder them.

I discussed gestures earlier, but there are a few other tricks worth noting. First, the Fire has no official back button, as you're supposed to swipe up from the bottom bezel instead. You can do the same from every side: The top pulls down quick settings and notifications; the left brings up the Amazon tray; and the right accesses your miscellaneous drawer. Be careful, though: On several occasions, I found myself looking at an unwanted drawer when I was actually swiping through my photo albums. Just don't get too close to the edge and you'll be fine.Amazon Fire OS 3.5 screenshots See all photos 58 Photos

You can also double-click the home button to bring up a list of recent apps, whereas a long-press will prompt the Fire virtual assistant. It's not as feature-rich as Siri, Cortana or Google Now, but it's better than nothing: You can tell it to make calls, do web searches and send texts or emails.

Whether you use security or not (and you should), a swipe to the left on the lock screen pulls up Amazon's "photo locker," a quick-access picture album that you can customize as you see fit. You can have as many as you'd like. This is most useful for bragging rights; all you have to do is whip out your phone and in two seconds you can show your friends how much those kids of yours have grown.

One of the nicer, but more low-key touches on the Fire is a setting that allows you to change your sound profile to silent for three hours, after which time it'll revert back to normal mode. This is perfect anytime you need a nap or have a work project you want to focus on. Most phones have some sort of quiet hours feature, but this option comes in handy if you need to do it quickly or simply don't feel like messing with your Do Not Disturb settings. If I may be picky, I'd like to customize this setting to fit whatever length of time I want; otherwise, it's a feature I'd like to see on more phones.

Camera

Amazon didn't skimp on imaging performance: The camera here has a 13-megapixel sensor with a five-element lens, f/2.0 aperture and optical image stabilization (OIS). These specs sound great on paper, and we were hopeful when Bezos showed photos where the Fire's shooter clearly beat out the iPhone 5s and Galaxy S5. And though the camera takes perfectly acceptable shots with the appropriate amount of detail, my own image comparisons with the same three phones didn't always come out in the Fire's favor.Amazon Fire phone sample shots See all photos 49 Photos

I'll break down the Fire's low-light performance first, since this was one of the camera's top selling points. The Fire outperformed the Galaxy S5, and it wasn't even a close call; the images on the Fire picked up more light and were far less noisy. Of course, this is one of the Galaxy's major weaknesses, so that wasn't much of a surprise. The real test came against the iPhone, which holds its own in dimly lit conditions. The comparison was much closer this time, but the iPhone ultimately came out on top because it was able to grab more errant light and with less noise. Also, I found the Fire was less consistent about keeping shots in focus in these conditions. In most cases, I had to remain completely still in order to get a clear picture, and had to discard several shots that came out blurry. Also, the LED flash on the Fire is noticeably less bright than on the iPhone and GS5.

The Fire's camera did a good job capturing detail in daylight, but it had a warmer white balance compared to competing phones. HDR was subtler and less cartoonish on the Fire than on the Galaxy and about the same as on the iPhone. I prefer it this way. White balance aside, the camera is decent enough for both night and day, even though it's not the best in either situation. Click here to see my sample shots in their full-res glory. I've also uploaded test shots I took with the iPhone and Galaxy S5, which you can find here and here.

Many lackluster cameras can at least earn a few brownie points by adding manual controls to let you take matters into your own hands, but the Fire has a minimal interface that features a toggle for HDR and flash, as well as the option to take pictures in lenticular mode (aka, GIF-making mode) and panoramic mode.

It's also capable of taking 1080p video at 30fps, recording at a bit rate of 20 Mbps. Again, it sounds great on paper, but I wasn't impressed. On a positive note, it didn't have a problem keeping motion smooth; however, it did so at the expense of detail -- and it re-focused more than it should have in broad daylight.

Performance and battery life

Deep inside the Fire phone, a 2.2GHz quad-core Snapdragon 800 chipset is running the show. Despite the fact that it's now two generations behind the current flagship processor, it's still a solid enough chipset that it should take care of business handily. As I mentioned earlier, Dynamic Perspective struggled from time to time, but unfortunately it also seemed to have an effect on other areas of the OS. I monitored CPU usage with the 3D effects turned on and off, and indeed, there was a considerable difference; all four cores worked harder and more consistently when the feature was turned on. And since Dynamic Perspective is used in tasks both small and large, it seemed to have an impact on the performance of the entire phone.

Turn the extra features off, and you'll have a grand time using the phone. You'll encounter fewer frame skips and stutters. Meanwhile, apps load reasonably fast and I didn't experience any crashes. Gaming was exactly as fast and smooth as I've come to expect from a Snapdragon 800. In general, the phone's performance is solid.

Fire phoneSamsung Galaxy S5 (AT&T)LG G3Quadrant 2.020,19522,23625,548Vellamo 3.01,7841,6761,7613DMark IS Unlimited14,14510,75716,662SunSpider 1.0.2 (ms)752791918GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex 1080p Offscreen (fps)22.827.427.9CF-Bench29,32135,35230,414SunSpider: Lower scores are better. GFXBench 3.0 not supported on Fire phone, so 2.7 was used.

I prefer real-world experience over numbers, but for our readers who prefer the opposite, check out the benchmark-comparison table above. In most areas, the Fire can contend in the big leagues despite the fact that it's on a previous-generation chipset running at a lower clock speed. It topped the other two devices in a couple benchmarks and held its own on most of the others. That said, the Fire's lower-res screen likely had an impact on at least one or two scores.

Gestures were inconsistent, however, and I noticed quite a few hiccups. Many times, a flick of the wrist or hand swivel wouldn't do anything, so I'd have to exaggerate the gesture once or twice before it did what I wanted. But there were other times in which barely tilting the phone at all triggered a gesture. On several other occasions, wrist flicks would bring up the exact opposite menu of what I intended.

The Fire only packs a 2,400mAh battery, which is small compared with the competition. Battery life is average and will last a full day... as long as you don't activate Dynamic Perspective and Firefly. (You know, the phone's two most unique features.) These two things are such a huge drain on the device's battery that I had to charge it up twice in the same day -- once in the early afternoon and again later that night. It wasn't uncommon to lose 10 percent of my charge in a half-hour. So if you plan on using Firefly for comparison shopping, make sure you shop for an external charger first.

In my endless-video loop test, meanwhile, the phone lasted nearly nine hours before dying. This is about average for a battery of this size, but then again, Amazon's fancy features weren't running at the time.

The audio quality is better than most. Calls were clear; in-call volume was more than adequate; and the stereo speakers were loud, if a little tinny. The phone's GPS also performed admirably, helping me navigate multiple routes without any lost connections.

The competition

As I mentioned earlier, the Fire's exclusive deal with AT&T severely limits its potential. It simply can't reach as many customers when it's only available on one carrier in the entire world. This strategy worked out fine for the original iPhone in 2007, but times are different now, and Amazon doesn't hold enough sway to get its members to switch platforms or carriers (or both) on top of paying $200 on-contract.

At least the Fire comes with a free year of Prime membership (a $99 value) to sweeten the deal, but the same price can also get the Samsung Galaxy S5, HTC One M8, iPhone 5s and LG G3, all of which have better displays, faster performance, stronger ecosystems and, in most cases, longer battery life. Although the Fire doesn't lag too far behind its flagship competitors, Amazon put so much effort into what makes it unique that it didn't focus enough on everything else.

Wrap-up

The Fire's defining features are fun, but I can't help but feel as though they're merely gimmicks designed by Amazon to demonstrate the company's brilliance -- and at the expense of battery life, to boot. Dynamic Perspective might be useful in a few cases (games, mainly), but it won't provide the user with functionality they'd sorely miss if they went with an iPhone or flagship Android device.

Not only is the Fire lacking in useful new features, but its high price and exclusivity to AT&T guarantee its irrelevance. The company owes its success to millions of loyal online shoppers and bookworms who use Amazon for its convenience and aggressive pricing, so why come out with a smartphone that isn't particularly convenient, and isn't particularly cheap? By no means is the Fire a horrible phone, but it's a forgettable one. You might want the eventual Fire Phone 2, perhaps, but for now, you're better off sticking with what you know.

0 Comments

Tags: amazon, amazonphone, android, att, dynamicperspective, Engadget spotlight review, fire, firefly, fireos, fireos3.5, firephone, mobilepostcross, review, spotlight review, spotlight reviews, toohotfromallthefire, uk-feature, uk-reviews, video Next: Edward Snowden's preferred OS has a major security flaw Amazon Fire Phone

Amazon Fire Phone thumbnail image Amazon Fire Phone 32GB 64GB AT&T 32GB AT&T 64GB Get it for FREE Key specs Reviews • 0 Prices Discussions Type Smartphone Operating system Android Screen size 4.7 inches Internal memory 32 GB Carriers (US) AT&T Dimensions 5.5 x 2.6 x 0.35 in Weight 5.64 oz Released 2014-07-25 see all specs → There are not any reviews for this product yet.
Why not be the first to write one?

Get better reviews from people who actually have this product!

write a reviewsee all reviews →

Displaying prices for model:

32GB-Black 64GB-Black Amazon.com FREE + tax & shipping Buy now 7 Is Amazon's Fire Phone worth caring about? Is Amazon's Fire Phone worth caring about?

Talk about the Amazon Fire Phone with other people who own it too!

start a discussion see all discussions → .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > span.fyre-comment-reply-wrapper {top: 18px;}.fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a, .fyre .fyre-comment-divider > a:hover {top: 20px;} AboutAbout EngadgetContact usAdvertiseAbout Our AdsCommunityForumsEngadget MetaCommunity guidelinesReviewsProduct reviewsWrite a reviewContributeSend us a tip!Add to our databaseWrite a reviewStart a discussionAsk a questionLive eventsEngadget ExpandEngadget LivePopular topicsMobileHDAltSoftwareAppleFollow EngadgetEngadget AppsMore Apps from Engadget

Subscribe to Engadget Newsletter

Top categoriescellphoneslaptops / portablestabletsheadphonescamerasroutershdtvs / televisionsportable media playersfitness devicese-book readersdigital media playersMobileCellphonesTabletsBluetooth HeadsetsGPSPhotographyCamerasCamera LensesCamcordersDigital Photo FramesGamingConsoles (home)Consoles (portable)Controllers / GamepadsJoysticks / Flight / RacingComputersLaptops/PortablesDesktopsOperating SystemsPeripheralsKeyboardsMiceMonitorsComputer SpeakersHeadsetsPrintersScannersPen TabletsUSB / Firewire HubsWebcamsPersonal TechHeadphonesPortable Media PlayersE-book ReadersFitnessMiscellaneous DevicesNetworkingRoutersSwitches / HubsStorageExternal Hard DrivesFlash DrivesMemory CardsNetwork StorageRAID / Drive ArraysHome TheaterHDTVs / TelevisionsSpeaker DocksDigital Media PlayersRemotes / ControllersA/V ReceiversDVRsSpeakersVideo Disc Players Engadget International EditionsEspañol繁體中文简体中文日本版DeutschlandAOL Tech.

© 2014 AOL Inc.
All rights reserved.Reprints and PermissionsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseTrademarksAOL A-Z HelpAdvertise with Us

the end

View the Original article